Speaker summary
52% 1 analyzed article/video 2,935 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Koohan Paik-Mander results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias , Optimism Bias , and Negativity Bias , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 11.2% saturation with 323.974 hits . Analysis detected 2,251.925 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,935 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 1% (43,403 of 43,625 speakers). This Koohan Paik-Mander is better (less manipulative) than 99.50% of the peer group. Koohan Paik-Mander
Speaker details
Total words: 2,935
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
1% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.5% percentile 2.5% BS Score1 analyzed videos2.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 3.4% 3.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 5.2% 5.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 4.6% 4.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 1.0% 1.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 1.4% 1.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Speaker 1.2% 1.2% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Speaker 0.9% 0.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Speaker 1.2% 1.2% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Speaker 1.1% 1.1% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Speaker 4.8% 4.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 3.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 5.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 4.6%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 11.2%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 1.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 1.4%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 8.2%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Speaker 7.3%, sitewide 6.0% In-Group Bias: Speaker 1.2%, sitewide 6.9% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 1.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Speaker 0.9%, sitewide 5.2% False Dilemma: Speaker 4.8%, sitewide 1.5% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 1.1%, sitewide 4.6% Pessimism Bias: Speaker 4.4%, sitewide 1.9% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 4.2%, sitewide 2.0% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 0.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 0.8%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 2.7%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% Slippery Slope: Speaker 2.7%, sitewide 1.7% Bandwagon: Speaker 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Speaker 1.3%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Speaker 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst