Speaker summary
⁠76%1 analyzed article/video94.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Keith Stanley results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Confirmation Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 39% saturation with 60 hits. Analysis detected 324.25 faulty-reasoning hits from 94.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 33.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠55% (20,503 of 45,123 speakers). This Keith Stanley is worse (more manipulative) than 54.60% of the peer group.
Keith Stanley
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%Paul Heideman1%
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Katy Longshore1%
⁠55%Keith Stanley (selected)34%
⁠100%291 Brewhouse100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 94.333
Article count: 1
Authors
?

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

55% percentile
025507510054.6% percentile
33.6% BS Score1 analyzed videos94.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 50.6%50.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 47.4%47.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 39.0%39.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 35.7%35.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 33.8%33.8%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 14.3%14.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 14.3%14.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Optimism Bias: Speaker 50.6%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 47.4%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 39.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 35.7%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Speaker 33.8%, sitewide 6.7%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 14.3%, sitewide 4.6%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 14.3%, sitewide 1.1%Optimism BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos