Speaker summary
⁠39%2 analyzed articles/videos58 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Justin Ballard results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias and Representativeness Heuristic, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 51.7% saturation with 60 hits. Analysis detected 104 faulty-reasoning hits from 58 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 29.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠50% (22,364 of 44,429 speakers). This Justin Ballard is better (less manipulative) than 50.30% of the peer group.
Justin Ballard
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%Paul Heideman1%
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Katy Longshore1%
⁠50%Justin Ballard (selected)30%
⁠100%291 Brewhouse100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 58
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

50% percentile
025507510049.7% percentile
29.9% BS Score2 analyzed videos58 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 51.7%51.7%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Speaker 19.0%19.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 19.0%19.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 51.7%, sitewide 11.1%Optimism Bias: Speaker 19.0%, sitewide 6.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 19.0%, sitewide 1.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos