Author summary
18% 13 analyzed articles/videos 9,783 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sondra Hernandez results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Indoctrination , and Hasty Generalization , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 6.9% saturation with 2,427 hits . Analysis detected 12,009 faulty-reasoning hits from 35,422 analyzed words across 13 articles, generating a BS Score of 0.9% and a BS Rank of 4% (9,137 of 9,471 authors). This Sondra Hernandez is better (less manipulative) than 96.50% of the peer group. Sondra Hernandez
Author details
Total words: 35,422
Article count: 13
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
4% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 3.5% percentile 0.9% BS Score13 analyzed articles35.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.3% 2.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 2.0% 2.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.9% 1.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 6.8% 6.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.4% 1.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.8% 0.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.7% 0.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.0% 2.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.1% 1.1% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.4% 0.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 2.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Indoctrination: Author 2.1%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst