Speaker summary
75% 10 analyzed articles/videos 299.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These John Barrasso results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Politically Right Leaning Bias , and Appeal to Authority , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 38.8% saturation with 124.228 hits . Analysis detected 601.346 faulty-reasoning hits from 299.667 analyzed words across 10 articles, generating a BS Score of 8.7% and a BS Rank of 10% (40,260 of 44,686 speakers). This John Barrasso is better (less manipulative) than 90.10% of the peer group. John Barrasso
Speaker details
Total words: 299.667
Article count: 10
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
10% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 9.9% percentile 8.7% BS Score10 analyzed videos299.7 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Speaker 38.8% 38.8% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 7.7% 7.7% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Speaker 14.8% 14.8% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Speaker 12.3% 12.3% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Speaker 7.7% 7.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Speaker 2.8% 2.8% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Speaker 6.0% 6.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Speaker 2.8% 2.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Speaker 9.5% 9.5% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 3.3% 3.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Halo Effect: Speaker 38.8%, sitewide 6.7% Framing Effect: Speaker 7.7%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 15.5%, sitewide 15.9% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Speaker 14.8%, sitewide 1.4% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 13.0%, sitewide 11.1% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 12.3%, sitewide 4.6% Optimism Bias: Speaker 9.5%, sitewide 6.0% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 6.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 7.0%, sitewide 8.1% Begging the Question: Speaker 7.7%, sitewide 1.7% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 2.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Speaker 2.8%, sitewide 6.9% False Dilemma: Speaker 6.0%, sitewide 1.5% Bandwagon: Speaker 4.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Speaker 4.0%, sitewide 2.2% Indoctrination: Speaker 3.3%, sitewide 0.0% Loss Aversion: Speaker 3.3%, sitewide 2.5% Composition/Division: Speaker 2.8%, sitewide 0.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 2.8%, sitewide 1.9% Halo Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst