Speaker summary
63%3 analyzed articles/videos811 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Joe Khan results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Availability Heuristic, and Framing Effect, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 39% saturation with 364.8 hits. Analysis detected 1,482.706 faulty-reasoning hits from 811 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 6.6% and a BS Rank of 6% (41,731 of 44,213 speakers). This Joe Khan is better (less manipulative) than 94.40% of the peer group.
Joe Khan
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
0%Paul Heideman1%
0%The Brookings Institution1%
0%Conor Heffernan1%
0%Gen Jack Keane1%
0%Katy Longshore1%
6%Joe Khan (selected)7%
100%291 Brewhouse100%
100%21 Grams100%
100%2035 Initiative100%
100%1X representative100%
100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 811
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

6% percentile
02550751005.6% percentile
6.6% BS Score3 analyzed videos811 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 39.0%39.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 13.4%13.4%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 8.5%8.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 5.2%5.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 0.6%0.6%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 4.5%4.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 4.5%4.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 8.4%8.4%Middle GroundSitewide 0.1%Speaker 3.1%3.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 3.2%3.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 39.0%, sitewide 15.9%Framing Effect: Speaker 13.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 17.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 5.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 10.2%, sitewide 9.1%Indoctrination: Speaker 8.5%, sitewide 0.0%Anecdotal: Speaker 8.4%, sitewide 5.2%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 4.5%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Speaker 5.3%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Speaker 3.2%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 0.6%, sitewide 5.3%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 4.5%, sitewide 0.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 3.3%Middle Ground: Speaker 3.1%, sitewide 0.1%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 2.7%, sitewide 1.1%Recency Bias: Speaker 2.6%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Speaker 2.1%, sitewide 1.5%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 1.3%, sitewide 2.0%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 1.3%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Speaker 0.4%, sitewide 1.7%Burden of Proof: Speaker 1.4%, sitewide 0.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate