Speaker summary
⁠63%1 analyzed article/video243.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jo Comerford results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including In-Group Bias, Confirmation Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.6% saturation with 58 hits. Analysis detected 553.4 faulty-reasoning hits from 243.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 7.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠9% (36,988 of 40,269 speakers). This Jo Comerford is better (less manipulative) than 91.90% of the peer group.
Jo Comerford
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%MARGARET BRENNAN1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠9%Jo Comerford (selected)8%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 243.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

8% percentile
02550751008.1% percentile
7.9% BS Score1 analyzed videos243.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Speaker 25.0%25.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 17.9%17.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 1.9%1.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 18.0%18.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 12.6%12.6%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Speaker 6.5%6.5%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Speaker 7.3%7.3%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Speaker 6.5%6.5%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 3.9%3.9%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Speaker 6.5%6.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Straw Man: Speaker 25.0%, sitewide 0.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 12.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 18.0%, sitewide 11.1%In-Group Bias: Speaker 17.9%, sitewide 6.9%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 14.6%, sitewide 15.9%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 10.8%, sitewide 7.5%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 9.6%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 1.9%, sitewide 9.1%Loss Aversion: Speaker 7.3%, sitewide 2.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 6.5%, sitewide 2.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 6.5%, sitewide 2.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Speaker 6.5%, sitewide 1.4%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 6.5%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 5.4%, sitewide 3.1%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 5.3%, sitewide 1.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Speaker 3.9%, sitewide 0.5%Indoctrination: Speaker 3.9%, sitewide 0.0%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 3.9%, sitewide 2.2%Slippery Slope: Speaker 2.6%, sitewide 1.7%Bandwagon: Speaker 1.9%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 1.9%, sitewide 0.8%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 1.9%, sitewide 1.1%Straw ManSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos