Speaker summary
79%1 analyzed article/video140 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jesus Echezarreta results contain 10 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Hindsight Bias, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 58.8% saturation with 173 hits. Analysis detected 674.143 faulty-reasoning hits from 140 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 27.9% and a BS Rank of 47% (20,843 of 39,040 speakers). This Jesus Echezarreta is better (less manipulative) than 53.40% of the peer group.
Jesus Echezarreta
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
0%The Brookings Institution1%
0%Conor Heffernan1%
0%Gen Jack Keane1%
0%MARGARET BRENNAN1%
0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
47%Jesus Echezarreta (selected)28%
100%314 Action Fund100%
100%21 Grams100%
100%2035 Initiative100%
100%1X representative100%
100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 140
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

47% percentile
025507510046.6% percentile
27.9% BS Score1 analyzed videos140 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 58.8%58.8%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Speaker 45.2%45.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 45.2%45.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 53.7%53.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 24.5%24.5%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 10.9%10.9%Primacy EffectSitewide 0.9%Speaker 8.2%8.2%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 10.5%10.5%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Speaker 10.5%10.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 10.9%10.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Anecdotal: Speaker 58.8%, sitewide 5.2%Negativity Bias: Speaker 53.7%, sitewide 19.2%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 45.2%, sitewide 8.1%Hindsight Bias: Speaker 45.2%, sitewide 1.4%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 24.5%, sitewide 7.5%Begging the Question: Speaker 10.9%, sitewide 1.7%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 10.9%, sitewide 5.3%Anchoring Bias: Speaker 10.5%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 10.5%, sitewide 3.3%Primacy Effect: Speaker 8.2%, sitewide 0.9%AnecdotalSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos