Speaker summary
78%5 analyzed articles/videos442 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jerry Dyer results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Hasty Generalization, and Self-Serving Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 19.1% saturation with 133 hits. Analysis detected 1,182.317 faulty-reasoning hits from 442 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 9% and a BS Rank of 11% (40,316 of 45,120 speakers). This Jerry Dyer is better (less manipulative) than 89.40% of the peer group.
Jerry Dyer
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
0%Paul Heideman1%
0%The Brookings Institution1%
0%Conor Heffernan1%
0%Gen Jack Keane1%
0%Katy Longshore1%
11%Jerry Dyer (selected)10%
100%291 Brewhouse100%
100%21 Grams100%
100%2035 Initiative100%
100%1X representative100%
100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 442
Article count: 5
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

11% percentile
025507510010.6% percentile
9.0% BS Score5 analyzed videos442 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 3.5%3.5%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 17.4%17.4%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 18.7%18.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 19.8%19.8%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Speaker 14.5%14.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 19.4%19.4%Circular ReasoningSitewide 0.1%Speaker 10.6%10.6%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 11.8%11.8%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Speaker 8.9%8.9%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Speaker 7.3%7.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 3.5%, sitewide 26.9%Anecdotal: Speaker 19.8%, sitewide 5.2%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 19.4%, sitewide 8.1%Negativity Bias: Speaker 19.1%, sitewide 19.2%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 18.7%, sitewide 3.7%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 17.4%, sitewide 15.9%False Dilemma: Speaker 17.4%, sitewide 1.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 14.5%, sitewide 2.7%Begging the Question: Speaker 11.8%, sitewide 1.7%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 6.8%, sitewide 11.1%Circular Reasoning: Speaker 10.6%, sitewide 0.1%Optimism Bias: Speaker 9.4%, sitewide 6.0%Hindsight Bias: Speaker 8.9%, sitewide 1.4%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 7.3%, sitewide 2.0%In-Group Bias: Speaker 6.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Speaker 4.5%, sitewide 6.7%Anchoring Bias: Speaker 6.1%, sitewide 4.0%No True Scotsman: Speaker 5.3%, sitewide 0.1%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 2.6%, sitewide 4.6%Special Pleading: Speaker 4.5%, sitewide 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias: Speaker 3.7%, sitewide 0.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 3.5%, sitewide 0.8%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 3.3%, sitewide 0.0%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate