Speaker summary
⁠44%2 analyzed articles/videos147.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jeffrey Sutton results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority and Appeal to Emotion, with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 22.5% saturation with 58 hits. Analysis detected 149.461 faulty-reasoning hits from 147.667 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 20.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠36% (26,027 of 40,167 speakers). This Jeffrey Sutton is better (less manipulative) than 64.80% of the peer group.
Jeffrey Sutton
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%MARGARET BRENNAN1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠36%Jeffrey Sutton (selected)21%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 147.667
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

35% percentile
025507510035.2% percentile
20.8% BS Score2 analyzed videos147.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 22.5%22.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 22.9%22.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 17.1%17.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 22.9%, sitewide 11.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 22.5%, sitewide 3.3%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 17.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos