Speaker summary
65% 7 analyzed articles/videos 1,558.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jason Smith results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Appeal to Authority , with Self-Serving Bias as the most egregious example at 19.8% saturation with 343.803 hits . Analysis detected 2,996.335 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,558.333 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.9% and a BS Rank of 3% (43,833 of 45,145 speakers). This Jason Smith is better (less manipulative) than 97.10% of the peer group. Jason Smith
Speaker details
Total words: 1,558.333
Article count: 7
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
3% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 2.9% percentile 4.9% BS Score7 analyzed videos1.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 6.9% 6.9% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Speaker 19.8% 19.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 5.0% 5.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 0.9% 0.9% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Speaker 8.3% 8.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Speaker 13.0% 13.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 2.8% 2.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Speaker 1.8% 1.8% Burden of Proof Sitewide 0.4% Speaker 4.5% 4.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Speaker 3.1% 3.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 6.9%, sitewide 26.9% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 19.8%, sitewide 3.7% Negativity Bias: Speaker 5.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 12.5%, sitewide 15.9% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 13.0%, sitewide 7.5% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 11.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 0.9%, sitewide 9.1% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Speaker 8.3%, sitewide 1.4% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 2.8%, sitewide 8.1% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 7.2%, sitewide 4.6% In-Group Bias: Speaker 1.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Speaker 3.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Speaker 6.0%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Speaker 2.8%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 5.2%, sitewide 3.3% Burden of Proof: Speaker 4.5%, sitewide 0.4% False Dilemma: Speaker 3.5%, sitewide 1.5% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 3.4%, sitewide 0.0% Begging the Question: Speaker 3.1%, sitewide 1.7% Loss Aversion: Speaker 1.7%, sitewide 2.5% Sunk Cost Effect: Speaker 2.4%, sitewide 0.3% Status Quo Bias: Speaker 1.8%, sitewide 2.2% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 2.1%, sitewide 1.1% Pessimism Bias: Speaker 1.9%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst