Speaker summary
71%1 analyzed article/video34.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jarron Aizen results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Appeal to Emotion, and Availability Heuristic, with Actor-Observer Bias as the most egregious example at 34.9% saturation with 22 hits. Analysis detected 151 faulty-reasoning hits from 34.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 30% and a BS Rank of 50% (22,633 of 45,142 speakers). This Jarron Aizen is better (less manipulative) than 50.10% of the peer group.
Jarron Aizen
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
0%Paul Heideman1%
0%The Brookings Institution1%
0%Conor Heffernan1%
0%Gen Jack Keane1%
0%Katy Longshore1%
50%Jarron Aizen (selected)30%
100%291 Brewhouse100%
100%21 Grams100%
100%2035 Initiative100%
100%1X representative100%
100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 34.5
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

50% percentile
025507510049.9% percentile
30.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos34.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Actor-Observer BiasSitewide 0.6%Speaker 34.9%34.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 34.9%34.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 34.9%34.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 34.9%34.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 34.9%34.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 34.9%34.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 20.6%20.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 9.5%9.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Actor-Observer Bias: Speaker 34.9%, sitewide 0.6%Anecdotal: Speaker 34.9%, sitewide 5.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 34.9%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 34.9%, sitewide 9.1%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 34.9%, sitewide 5.3%Halo Effect: Speaker 34.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Speaker 20.6%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 9.5%, sitewide 11.1%Actor-Observer BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos