Speaker summary
76%9 analyzed articles/videos527.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These James Percival results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Negativity Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with Self-Serving Bias as the most egregious example at 22.4% saturation with 176 hits. Analysis detected 1,318.81 faulty-reasoning hits from 527.333 analyzed words across 9 articles, generating a BS Score of 9.4% and a BS Rank of 12% (38,603 of 43,503 speakers). This James Percival is better (less manipulative) than 88.70% of the peer group.
James Percival
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
0%Paul Heideman1%
0%The Brookings Institution1%
0%Conor Heffernan1%
0%Gen Jack Keane1%
0%Katy Longshore1%
12%James Percival (selected)10%
100%291 Brewhouse100%
100%21 Grams100%
100%2035 Initiative100%
100%1X representative100%
100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

11% percentile
025507510011.3% percentile
9.4% BS Score9 analyzed videos527.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 22.4%22.4%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 15.3%15.3%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Speaker 11.4%11.4%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 12.7%12.7%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 7.2%7.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 18.0%18.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 6.0%6.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 22.7%22.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 11.6%11.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 2.0%2.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 22.7%, sitewide 26.9%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 22.4%, sitewide 3.7%Negativity Bias: Speaker 18.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 18.0%, sitewide 11.1%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 14.2%, sitewide 15.9%Begging the Question: Speaker 15.3%, sitewide 1.7%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 12.7%, sitewide 4.6%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 11.6%, sitewide 7.5%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Speaker 11.4%, sitewide 1.4%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 9.9%, sitewide 8.1%Indoctrination: Speaker 7.2%, sitewide 0.0%In-Group Bias: Speaker 7.0%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Speaker 2.0%, sitewide 6.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 6.0%, sitewide 0.8%False Dilemma: Speaker 4.8%, sitewide 1.5%Bandwagon: Speaker 3.9%, sitewide 2.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 3.7%, sitewide 3.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 3.7%, sitewide 0.0%Ad Hominem: Speaker 3.6%, sitewide 2.2%Recency Bias: Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 2.0%, sitewide 2.2%Burden of Proof: Speaker 2.0%, sitewide 0.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate