Speaker summary
64% 6 analyzed articles/videos 581 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jacob Soboroff results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Unattributed Quote , and Appeal to Authority , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 18.3% saturation with 119.3 hits . Analysis detected 1,247.117 faulty-reasoning hits from 581 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 6.7% and a BS Rank of 6% (42,344 of 44,965 speakers). This Jacob Soboroff is better (less manipulative) than 94.20% of the peer group. Jacob Soboroff
Speaker details
Total words: 581
Article count: 6
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
6% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 5.8% percentile 6.7% BS Score6 analyzed videos581 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 7.4% 7.4% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 12.1% 12.1% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Speaker 10.3% 10.3% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Speaker 8.9% 8.9% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Speaker 10.3% 10.3% Primacy Effect Sitewide 0.9% Speaker 7.0% 7.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 3.9% 3.9% No True Scotsman Sitewide 0.1% Speaker 5.2% 5.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Speaker 5.1% 5.1% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Speaker 5.9% 5.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 7.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 18.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 11.9%, sitewide 15.9% Indoctrination: Speaker 12.1%, sitewide 0.0% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 11.7%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 8.6%, sitewide 11.1% Ad Hominem: Speaker 10.3%, sitewide 2.2% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 10.3%, sitewide 3.1% In-Group Bias: Speaker 9.2%, sitewide 6.9% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 3.9%, sitewide 9.1% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 8.9%, sitewide 1.1% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 6.0%, sitewide 7.5% Primacy Effect: Speaker 7.0%, sitewide 0.9% Optimism Bias: Speaker 6.4%, sitewide 6.0% Begging the Question: Speaker 5.9%, sitewide 1.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 5.6%, sitewide 2.0% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 4.0%, sitewide 5.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 5.2%, sitewide 2.7% No True Scotsman: Speaker 5.2%, sitewide 0.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 5.1%, sitewide 0.8% Anchoring Bias: Speaker 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% False Dilemma: Speaker 3.6%, sitewide 1.5% Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 3.4%, sitewide 1.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 1.9%, sitewide 3.3% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst