Speaker summary
59% 36 analyzed articles/videos 1,728.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Israel Katz results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including In-Group Bias , Framing Effect , and Biased Writer Voice , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 22.5% saturation with 665 hits . Analysis detected 3,587.762 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,728.667 analyzed words across 36 articles, generating a BS Score of 5.2% and a BS Rank of 4% (43,964 of 45,516 speakers). This Israel Katz is better (less manipulative) than 96.60% of the peer group. Israel Katz
Speaker details
Total words: 1,728.667
Article count: 36
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
3% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 3.4% percentile 5.2% BS Score36 analyzed videos1.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Speaker SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 14.0% 14.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 9.6% 9.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 3.1% 3.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 1.1% 1.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 22.5% 22.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Speaker 1.1% 1.1% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Speaker 6.2% 6.2% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Speaker 6.5% 6.5% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 4.2% 4.2% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Speaker 5.3% 5.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 14.0%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 22.5%, sitewide 15.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 9.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 3.1%, sitewide 11.1% In-Group Bias: Speaker 10.6%, sitewide 6.9% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 1.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 1.1%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 7.4%, sitewide 5.3% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 7.2%, sitewide 3.7% Halo Effect: Speaker 6.0%, sitewide 6.7% Pessimism Bias: Speaker 6.5%, sitewide 1.9% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 6.2%, sitewide 1.1% Status Quo Bias: Speaker 5.3%, sitewide 2.2% Begging the Question: Speaker 5.3%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Speaker 5.3%, sitewide 1.5% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 5.0%, sitewide 4.6% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 4.2%, sitewide 0.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 3.5%, sitewide 0.8% Slippery Slope: Speaker 3.5%, sitewide 1.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 0.3%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 2.8%, sitewide 3.1% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 1.7%, sitewide 2.0% Indoctrination: Speaker 1.9%, sitewide 0.0% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Speaker 1.9%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst