Speaker summary
⁠54%1 analyzed article/video84 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ian Appleyard results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Unattributed Quote, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 92.8% saturation with 128 hits. Analysis detected 172 faulty-reasoning hits from 84 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 31.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠52% (21,831 of 44,923 speakers). This Ian Appleyard is worse (more manipulative) than 51.40% of the peer group.
Ian Appleyard
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%Paul Heideman1%
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Katy Longshore1%
⁠52%Ian Appleyard (selected)32%
⁠100%291 Brewhouse100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 84
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

51% percentile
025507510051.4% percentile
31.2% BS Score1 analyzed videos84 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 92.8%92.8%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 17.4%17.4%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 7.3%7.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 7.3%7.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Anecdotal: Speaker 92.8%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 17.4%, sitewide 3.7%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 7.3%, sitewide 5.3%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 7.3%, sitewide 1.1%AnecdotalSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos