Author summary
28% 3 analyzed articles/videos 2,472 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nathan Dalton results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal , Hasty Generalization , and Appeal to Emotion , with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 10.6% saturation with 1,044 hits . Analysis detected 5,033 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,888 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 33% (6,413 of 9,538 authors). This Nathan Dalton is better (less manipulative) than 67.20% of the peer group. Nathan Dalton
Author details
Total words: 9,888
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
33% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 32.8% percentile 1.7% BS Score3 analyzed articles9.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 1.4% 1.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 2.3% 2.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.9% 2.9% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Author 10.6% 10.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.0% 2.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.2% 2.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.0% 1.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.9% 0.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.4% 3.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.4% 2.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 1.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.0%, sitewide 11.1% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 10.6%, sitewide 0.5% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 2.4%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Author 6.5%, sitewide 5.2% Optimism Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.2%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.3%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Loss Aversion: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.7% Indoctrination: Author 1.6%, sitewide 0.0% False Dilemma: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.5% Unattributed Quote: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst