Speaker summary
⁠83%3 analyzed articles/videos56 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hims & Hers results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Negativity Bias, with Ad Hominem as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 40 hits. Analysis detected 134.263 faulty-reasoning hits from 56 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 65.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠80% (9,422 of 45,350 speakers). This Hims & Hers is worse (more manipulative) than 79.20% of the peer group.
Hims & Hers
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%Paul Heideman1%
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Katy Longshore1%
⁠80%Hims & Hers (selected)66%
⁠100%291 Brewhouse100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 56
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

79% percentile
025507510079.2% percentile
65.3% BS Score3 analyzed videos56 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 76.3%76.3%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Ad Hominem: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 2.2%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 76.3%, sitewide 3.7%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 19.2%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 1.1%Ad HominemSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos