Speaker summary
73%3 analyzed articles/videos216.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hilario Dominguez results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, In-Group Bias, and Self-Serving Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 38.1% saturation with 112 hits. Analysis detected 376.559 faulty-reasoning hits from 216.667 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 20.7% and a BS Rank of 36% (29,165 of 45,145 speakers). This Hilario Dominguez is better (less manipulative) than 64.60% of the peer group.
Hilario Dominguez
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
0%Paul Heideman1%
0%The Brookings Institution1%
0%Conor Heffernan1%
0%Gen Jack Keane1%
0%Katy Longshore1%
36%Hilario Dominguez (selected)21%
100%291 Brewhouse100%
100%21 Grams100%
100%2035 Initiative100%
100%1X representative100%
100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 216.667
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

35% percentile
025507510035.4% percentile
20.7% BS Score3 analyzed videos216.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 31.0%31.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 38.1%38.1%Special PleadingSitewide 0.3%Speaker 17.4%17.4%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 19.3%19.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 22.1%22.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 10.5%10.5%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Speaker 6.5%6.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 38.1%, sitewide 15.9%Optimism Bias: Speaker 31.0%, sitewide 6.0%In-Group Bias: Speaker 22.1%, sitewide 6.9%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 19.3%, sitewide 3.7%Special Pleading: Speaker 17.4%, sitewide 0.3%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 10.5%, sitewide 3.3%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 6.5%, sitewide 2.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate