WBEZ50%

CTU endorses 15 school board candidates, throwing weight behind incumbents, mayoral picks 35%

By Sarah Karp40%

7/13/2026, 5:56:57 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 29 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Appeal to Authority, with Unattributed Quote as the most egregious example at 27.3% saturation with 211 hits. Analysis detected 1,629 faulty-reasoning hits from 774 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 36.3% and a BS Rank of 35% (17,963 of 27,265 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 65.90% of the article peer group.

The Chicago Teachers Union announced Monday it will endorse only 15 candidates in the upcoming school board race in which all 21 seats are up for election  a decision that could make it difficult for the union to hold onto its majority. 
The union will back 10 incumbents who they supported in the election two years ago or were appointed by Mayor Brandon Johnson. 
Johnson, a former organizer for the CTU, is an ally of the union. 
Notably absent from their list of endorsements is Yesenia Lopez, who won in 2024 with the union’s endorsement , but occasionally voted independently of other CTU-aligned school board members over the past year and half. 
CTU last month endorsed their political director Hilario Dominguez in the citywide race for school board president. 
There are four other people running for that seat. 
In the six districts where the CTU did not endorse anyone, it was because the race had only one candidate or there’s no candidate aligned with the CTU. 
One of the five non-incumbents getting CTU’s nod is Tameka Walton, who the union said is mounting a write-in campaign. 
Walton’s petition signatures were challenged and the Chicago Board of Elections is expected to make decisions on petition challenges Tuesday. 
Angel L. 
Velez, the incumbent vice president of the board who was appointed by Johnson and filed to run for his seat in district 9a, also announced on social media last week that he did not have enough valid signatures to stay on the ballot. 
That leaves Brittany Bailey Preston, the wife of state Sen. 
Willie Preston, as the only candidate in the race. 
Juan Rangel, the CEO of the Urban Center, a political action committee paying for many of the petition challenges , said Cydney Wallace, a Johnson appointee running in 8b is also expected to be removed from the ballot. 
CTU did not include Velez or Wallace in their endorsements. 
The CTU has been seen as a politically powerful force, especially after getting Johnson elected, but it remains to be seen how much their endorsement matters. 
In the first school board election in 2024, the union endorsed in all 10 races and only four of their candidates were victorious. 
Still, the union had a friendly school board because Johnson appointed 11 people, giving them enough backers to have a majority on the 21-member board. 
CTU-backed candidates would have to win 11 races to hold onto a majority. 
The CTU’s two political action committees had a balance of less than $200,000 as of March 31, the last time quarterly filings were due. 
New reports are due out on Wednesday. 
The union also boasts more than 30,000 members that can knock on doors and get out the vote, which will be important in the Nov. 3 election where turnout could be low . 
Kimberly Walls-Kirk, chair of the CTU’s political action committee, says the union’s endorsements carry weight with voters because they trust teachers. 
“I’m the parent of a child who graduated from a Chicago Public School. 
I'm a teacher in Chicago Public Schools,” she said. 
“So if I have a vision of what learning conditions look like for my child, then I, as a teacher, am one of the best people to endorse a candidate.” 
A handful of other political action committees have already raised more than a million each and have already started donating money to candidates . 
Rangel said he was surprised that the CTU wasn’t more organized as they approached this election. 
The Urban Center PAC is supported by centrist billionaires and pro-charter groups. 
“The CTU has a reputation of having first-class, first-grade political operations, but I think they’ve been kind of sloppy on this this time around, and I’m not sure the exact reason why,” he said. 
Dominguez, the CTU’s endorsed presidential candidate, blamed the lack of challengers in some races on the fact that it is a volunteer position that is essentially a full-time job, he said. 
Andrew Broy, the president of the Illinois Network of Charter Schools, said that based on 2024 election results , the power of a CTU endorsement is a “mixed bag”  more helpful in some well-to-do or gentrifying areas such as the North Side and Logan Square, and less so on the Southwest and Northwest Side. 
Overall, he said, recent opinion polls suggest the union’s popularity has dipped. 
“That might blunt the positive impact of a CTU endorsement,” Broy said. 
President Hilario Dominguez 
2B Deborah "Debby" Pope 
3A Norma Rios Sierra 
5A Aaron "Jitu" Brown 
5B Michilla "Kyla" Blaise 
9B Katherine S. 
Dunneback 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 3.6%Sarah Karp: 1.3%Chicago Sun-Times: 2.5%Confirmation Bias3.6%This article: 3.1%Sarah Karp: 0.9%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.5%Anchoring Bias3.1%This article: 3.1%Sarah Karp: 1.8%Chicago Sun-Times: 2.4%Availability Heuristic3.1%This article: 7.1%Sarah Karp: 1.1%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic7.1%This article: 3.4%Sarah Karp: 0.3%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.7%Hindsight Bias3.4%This article: 0.0%Sarah Karp: 0.5%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.8%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 1.6%Sarah Karp: 4.5%Chicago Sun-Times: 4.0%Framing Effect1.6%This article: 0.0%Sarah Karp: 0.4%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.6%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 3.4%Sarah Karp: 0.5%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.6%Status Quo Bias3.4%This article: 0.0%Sarah Karp: 0.1%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 4.3%Sarah Karp: 2.6%Chicago Sun-Times: 2.4%Optimism Bias4.3%This article: 11.0%Sarah Karp: 1.4%Chicago Sun-Times: 1.2%Pessimism Bias11.0%This article: 20.5%Sarah Karp: 6.7%Chicago Sun-Times: 6.4%Negativity Bias20.5%This article: 7.9%Sarah Karp: 1.9%Chicago Sun-Times: 1.3%Self-Serving Bias7.9%This article: 3.2%Sarah Karp: 0.8%Chicago Sun-Times: 1.0%Fundamental Attribution Error3.2%This article: 0.0%Sarah Karp: 0.0%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 3.2%Sarah Karp: 1.4%Chicago Sun-Times: 1.2%In-Group Bias3.2%This article: 0.0%Sarah Karp: 0.1%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 2.7%Sarah Karp: 1.9%Chicago Sun-Times: 2.5%Halo Effect2.7%This article: 0.0%Sarah Karp: 0.1%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Karp: 0.0%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 8.5%Sarah Karp: 0.8%Chicago Sun-Times: 1.3%Recency Bias8.5%This article: 0.0%Sarah Karp: 0.1%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.3%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Karp: 0.0%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 1.6%Sarah Karp: 0.8%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.6%Ad Hominem1.6%This article: 0.0%Sarah Karp: 0.4%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 15.9%Sarah Karp: 2.6%Chicago Sun-Times: 2.2%Appeal to Authority15.9%This article: 0.0%Sarah Karp: 1.5%Chicago Sun-Times: 1.2%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Karp: 0.1%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.6%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 3.9%Sarah Karp: 0.1%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.1%Circular Reasoning3.9%This article: 17.7%Sarah Karp: 1.8%Chicago Sun-Times: 3.7%Hasty Generalization17.7%This article: 0.0%Sarah Karp: 0.0%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.1%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Karp: 0.2%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.5%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 4.3%Sarah Karp: 3.6%Chicago Sun-Times: 4.4%Appeal to Emotion4.3%This article: 2.7%Sarah Karp: 0.5%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.7%Begging the Question2.7%This article: 8.8%Sarah Karp: 2.2%Chicago Sun-Times: 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause)8.8%This article: 0.0%Sarah Karp: 0.2%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Karp: 0.1%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.3%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Karp: 0.1%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.0%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 3.2%Sarah Karp: 0.4%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.3%Composition/Division3.2%This article: 0.0%Sarah Karp: 1.5%Chicago Sun-Times: 2.5%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Karp: 0.0%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 12.4%Sarah Karp: 0.6%Chicago Sun-Times: 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation)12.4%This article: 0.0%Sarah Karp: 0.0%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Karp: 0.1%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 4.4%Sarah Karp: 0.1%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.0%Personal Incredulity4.4%This article: 0.0%Sarah Karp: 0.1%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Karp: 0.3%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 27.3%Sarah Karp: 1.1%Chicago Sun-Times: 1.3%Unattributed Quote27.3%This article: 1.7%Sarah Karp: 0.5%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.6%Quote-first Misdirection1.7%This article: 11.5%Sarah Karp: 2.6%Chicago Sun-Times: 3.9%Biased Writer Voice11.5%This article: 8.7%Sarah Karp: 0.4%Chicago Sun-Times: 1.6%Indoctrination8.7%This article: 0.0%Sarah Karp: 0.2%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Karp: 0.0%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Sarah Karp: 0.0%Chicago Sun-Times: 0.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

774 words analyzed.

Speakers

5speakers49%attributed speech391writer words
Selected voice

Andrew Broy

100%flagged-word coverage
79 attributed words21% of attributed speech76% writer coverage
0%42.5%85.0%Unattributed Quote+68.7 ptsWriter: 16.1%Andrew Broy: 84.8%84.8%Biased Writer Voice-14.1 ptsWriter: 14.1%Andrew Broy: 0.0%0.0%Indoctrination-8.4 ptsWriter: 8.4%Andrew Broy: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.