Speaker summary
96%1 analyzed article/video10 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Harrison results contain 1 faulty reasoning type, including Appeal to Authority, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 10 hits. Analysis detected 10 faulty-reasoning hits from 10 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of 95% (2,554 of 45,128 speakers). This Harrison is worse (more manipulative) than 94.30% of the peer group.
Harrison
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
0%Paul Heideman1%
0%The Brookings Institution1%
0%Conor Heffernan1%
0%Gen Jack Keane1%
0%Katy Longshore1%
95%Harrison (selected)100%
100%291 Brewhouse100%
100%21 Grams100%
100%2035 Initiative100%
100%1X representative100%
100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 10
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

94% percentile
025507510094.3% percentile
100.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos10 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 100.0%100.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 11.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos