Speaker summary
⁠77%1 analyzed article/video119.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Gregg W. Perloff results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Loss Aversion, and Appeal to Authority, with Self-Serving Bias as the most egregious example at 63.7% saturation with 87 hits. Analysis detected 279 faulty-reasoning hits from 119.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 26.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠45% (24,916 of 45,112 speakers). This Gregg W. Perloff is better (less manipulative) than 55.20% of the peer group.
Gregg W. Perloff
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%Paul Heideman1%
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Katy Longshore1%
⁠45%Gregg W. Perloff (selected)27%
⁠100%291 Brewhouse100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 119.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

45% percentile
025507510044.8% percentile
26.2% BS Score1 analyzed videos119.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 63.7%63.7%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 28.6%28.6%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Speaker 17.6%17.6%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 14.3%14.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 28.6%28.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 15.4%15.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 15.4%15.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 63.7%, sitewide 3.7%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 28.6%, sitewide 15.9%Ad Hominem: Speaker 28.6%, sitewide 2.2%Loss Aversion: Speaker 17.6%, sitewide 2.5%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 15.4%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Speaker 15.4%, sitewide 6.7%Indoctrination: Speaker 14.3%, sitewide 0.0%Self-Serving BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos