Speaker summary
⁠57%1 analyzed article/video45.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Gina results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Negativity Bias, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Unattributed Quote as the most egregious example at 39% saturation with 30 hits. Analysis detected 100 faulty-reasoning hits from 45.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 34.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠56% (20,239 of 45,122 speakers). This Gina is worse (more manipulative) than 55.10% of the peer group.
Gina
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%Paul Heideman1%
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Katy Longshore1%
⁠56%Gina (selected)35%
⁠100%291 Brewhouse100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 45.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

55% percentile
025507510055.1% percentile
34.1% BS Score1 analyzed videos45.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 66.7%66.7%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 39.0%39.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 26.0%26.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 26.0%26.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 13.0%13.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 66.7%, sitewide 15.9%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 39.0%, sitewide 1.1%Negativity Bias: Speaker 26.0%, sitewide 19.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 26.0%, sitewide 3.3%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 13.0%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos