43%4 analyzed articles/videos64.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Federal health officials results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Biased Writer Voice, and False Dilemma, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 36.1% saturation with 53 hits. Analysis detected 225 faulty-reasoning hits from 64.333 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 21.9% and a BS Rank of 38% (28,219 of 45,063 speakers).This Federal health officials is better (less manipulative) than 62.60% of the peer group.