Speaker summary
⁠88%1 analyzed article/video61 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dr. Gregory M. Marcus results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias, Unattributed Quote, and Pessimism Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 96.7% saturation with 59 hits. Analysis detected 128 faulty-reasoning hits from 61 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 52.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠75% (11,691 of 45,144 speakers). This Dr. Gregory M. Marcus is worse (more manipulative) than 74.10% of the peer group.
Dr. Gregory M. Marcus
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%Paul Heideman1%
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Katy Longshore1%
⁠75%Dr. Gregory M. Marcus (selected)53%
⁠100%291 Brewhouse100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 61
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

74% percentile
025507510074.1% percentile
52.5% BS Score1 analyzed videos61 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 96.7%96.7%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 39.3%39.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 39.3%39.3%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 34.4%34.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 96.7%, sitewide 11.1%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 39.3%, sitewide 4.6%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 39.3%, sitewide 1.1%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 34.4%, sitewide 1.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos