Speaker summary
⁠97%1 analyzed article/video38 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Doug McKendrick results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias and Status Quo Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 38 hits. Analysis detected 114 faulty-reasoning hits from 38 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠97% (1,777 of 45,144 speakers). This Doug McKendrick is worse (more manipulative) than 96.10% of the peer group.
Doug McKendrick
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%Paul Heideman1%
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Katy Longshore1%
⁠97%Doug McKendrick (selected)100%
⁠100%291 Brewhouse100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 38
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

96% percentile
025507510096.1% percentile
100.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos38 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 100.0%100.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 11.1%Optimism Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 6.0%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 2.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos