Speaker summary
⁠83%1 analyzed article/video88 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Daniel Narvey results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Pessimism Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Hasty Generalization, with Loss Aversion as the most egregious example at 51.5% saturation with 51 hits. Analysis detected 240.75 faulty-reasoning hits from 88 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 37.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠59% (18,766 of 45,520 speakers). This Daniel Narvey is worse (more manipulative) than 58.80% of the peer group.
Daniel Narvey
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%Paul Heideman1%
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Katy Longshore1%
⁠59%Daniel Narvey (selected)38%
⁠100%291 Brewhouse100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 88
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

59% percentile
025507510058.8% percentile
37.8% BS Score1 analyzed videos88 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Speaker 51.5%51.5%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 48.5%48.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 37.9%37.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 38.6%38.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 24.2%24.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 25.8%25.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Loss Aversion: Speaker 51.5%, sitewide 2.5%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 48.5%, sitewide 1.9%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 38.6%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 37.9%, sitewide 8.1%Negativity Bias: Speaker 25.8%, sitewide 19.2%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 24.2%, sitewide 9.1%Loss AversionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos