Speaker summary
⁠71%1 analyzed article/video82 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dani Phillips results contain 1 faulty reasoning type, including Anecdotal, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 50% saturation with 41 hits. Analysis detected 41 faulty-reasoning hits from 82 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 50% and a BS Rank of ⁠72% (11,599 of 40,388 speakers). This Dani Phillips is worse (more manipulative) than 71.30% of the peer group.
Dani Phillips
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%MARGARET BRENNAN1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠72%Dani Phillips (selected)50%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 82
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

71% percentile
025507510071.3% percentile
50.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos82 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Anecdotal: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 5.2%AnecdotalSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos