Speaker summary
86%4 analyzed articles/videos140 analyzed words
BS Summary: These CTU results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Bandwagon, and Unattributed Quote, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 50% saturation with 70 hits. Analysis detected 244 faulty-reasoning hits from 140 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 24.9% and a BS Rank of 42% (23,925 of 41,180 speakers). This CTU is better (less manipulative) than 58.10% of the peer group.
CTU
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
0%The Brookings Institution1%
0%Conor Heffernan1%
0%Gen Jack Keane1%
0%MARGARET BRENNAN1%
0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
42%CTU (selected)25%
100%314 Action Fund100%
100%21 Grams100%
100%2035 Initiative100%
100%1X representative100%
100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 140
Article count: 4
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

42% percentile
025507510041.9% percentile
24.9% BS Score4 analyzed videos140 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 50.0%50.0%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Speaker 30.0%30.0%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 23.6%23.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 32.1%32.1%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 8.6%8.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 17.1%17.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 12.9%12.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Negativity Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 32.1%, sitewide 11.1%Bandwagon: Speaker 30.0%, sitewide 2.2%Framing Effect: Speaker 8.6%, sitewide 26.9%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 23.6%, sitewide 1.1%In-Group Bias: Speaker 17.1%, sitewide 6.9%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 12.9%, sitewide 7.5%Negativity BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos