Speaker summary
74% 1 analyzed article/video 130 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Crystal Stewart results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination , Bandwagon , and Appeal to Emotion , with In-Group Bias as the most egregious example at 62.3% saturation with 89.647 hits . Analysis detected 352.647 faulty-reasoning hits from 130 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 21.2% and a BS Rank of 37% (28,860 of 45,352 speakers). This Crystal Stewart is better (less manipulative) than 63.60% of the peer group. Crystal Stewart
Speaker details
Total words: 130
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
36% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 36.4% percentile 21.2% BS Score1 analyzed videos130 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–75%
0.0% 20% 40% 60% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Speaker 62.3% 62.3% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 31.9% 31.9% Bandwagon Sitewide 2.2% Speaker 21.1% 21.1% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 9.3% 9.3% Composition/Division Sitewide 0.2% Speaker 14.2% 14.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Speaker 16.7% 16.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 19.1% 19.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 14.2% 14.2% Middle Ground Sitewide 0.1% Speaker 2.5% 2.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 20% 20% 40% 40% 60% 60% In-Group Bias: Speaker 62.3%, sitewide 6.9% Indoctrination: Speaker 31.9%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect: Speaker 9.3%, sitewide 26.9% Bandwagon: Speaker 21.1%, sitewide 2.2% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 19.1%, sitewide 15.9% Optimism Bias: Speaker 16.7%, sitewide 6.0% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 14.2%, sitewide 11.1% Composition/Division: Speaker 14.2%, sitewide 0.2% Middle Ground: Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 0.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst