Author summary
29% 3 analyzed articles/videos 1,714 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Katie Ellington Serrao results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Anecdotal , and In-Group Bias , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 8.7% saturation with 594 hits . Analysis detected 3,220 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,856 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 23% (6,718 of 8,706 authors). This Katie Ellington Serrao is better (less manipulative) than 77.20% of the peer group. Katie Ellington Serrao
Author details
Total words: 6,856
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
23% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 22.8% percentile 1.5% BS Score3 analyzed articles6.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 1.2% 1.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 1.5% 1.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.0% 4.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.3% 1.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.5% 2.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.0% 2.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.7% 0.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.1% 2.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 0.3% 0.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.7% 2.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 1.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.5%, sitewide 9.1% Optimism Bias: Author 8.7%, sitewide 6.0% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 3.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.3%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% Indoctrination: Author 2.5%, sitewide 0.0% Bandwagon: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 0.1%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst