Speaker summary
⁠39%1 analyzed article/video57.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Christian Paz results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Quote-first Misdirection and Unattributed Quote, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 50% saturation with 43 hits. Analysis detected 129 faulty-reasoning hits from 57.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 50% and a BS Rank of ⁠72% (12,628 of 45,123 speakers). This Christian Paz is worse (more manipulative) than 72.00% of the peer group.
Christian Paz
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%Paul Heideman1%
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Katy Longshore1%
⁠72%Christian Paz (selected)50%
⁠100%291 Brewhouse100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 57.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

72% percentile
025507510072.0% percentile
50.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos57.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Framing Effect: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 26.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos