Speaker summary
67%6 analyzed articles/videos361.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Chris Jordan results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Self-Serving Bias, and Anecdotal, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 51% saturation with 191.159 hits. Analysis detected 480.317 faulty-reasoning hits from 361.333 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 23.6% and a BS Rank of 41% (26,960 of 45,144 speakers). This Chris Jordan is better (less manipulative) than 59.70% of the peer group.
Chris Jordan
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
0%Paul Heideman1%
0%The Brookings Institution1%
0%Conor Heffernan1%
0%Gen Jack Keane1%
0%Katy Longshore1%
41%Chris Jordan (selected)24%
100%291 Brewhouse100%
100%21 Grams100%
100%2035 Initiative100%
100%1X representative100%
100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

40% percentile
025507510040.3% percentile
23.6% BS Score6 analyzed videos361.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 51.0%51.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 22.2%22.2%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 13.7%13.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 28.8%28.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 2.3%2.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 51.0%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 28.8%, sitewide 19.2%Anecdotal: Speaker 22.2%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 13.7%, sitewide 3.7%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 2.3%, sitewide 11.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate