Speaker summary
⁠39%1 analyzed article/video65.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Charlie Fusco results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect and Optimism Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 21.8% saturation with 24 hits. Analysis detected 55 faulty-reasoning hits from 65.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 16.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠28% (32,467 of 44,967 speakers). This Charlie Fusco is better (less manipulative) than 72.20% of the peer group.
Charlie Fusco
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%Paul Heideman1%
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Katy Longshore1%
⁠28%Charlie Fusco (selected)17%
⁠100%291 Brewhouse100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 65.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

28% percentile
025507510027.8% percentile
16.7% BS Score1 analyzed videos65.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 21.8%21.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 16.4%16.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 11.8%11.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 21.8%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Speaker 16.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Speaker 11.8%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos