Speaker summary
⁠56%1 analyzed article/video79.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Charise Butler results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion and Framing Effect, with Availability Heuristic as the most egregious example at 40.7% saturation with 33 hits. Analysis detected 80 faulty-reasoning hits from 79.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 33.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠55% (20,596 of 45,538 speakers). This Charise Butler is worse (more manipulative) than 54.80% of the peer group.
Charise Butler
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%Paul Heideman1%
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Katy Longshore1%
⁠55%Charise Butler (selected)34%
⁠100%291 Brewhouse100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 79.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

55% percentile
025507510054.8% percentile
33.8% BS Score1 analyzed videos79.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 40.7%40.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 40.8%40.8%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 19.8%19.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 40.8%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 40.7%, sitewide 9.1%Framing Effect: Speaker 19.8%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos