Speaker summary
⁠52%1 analyzed article/video117 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Central Command (Centcom) results contain 1 faulty reasoning type, including Appeal to Authority, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 32.5% saturation with 38 hits. Analysis detected 38 faulty-reasoning hits from 117 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 32.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠53% (21,090 of 44,711 speakers). This Central Command (Centcom) is worse (more manipulative) than 52.80% of the peer group.
Central Command (Centcom)
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%Paul Heideman1%
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Katy Longshore1%
⁠53%Central Command (Centcom) (selected)33%
⁠100%291 Brewhouse100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 117
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

53% percentile
025507510052.8% percentile
32.5% BS Score1 analyzed videos117 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 32.5%32.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 32.5%, sitewide 11.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos