Speaker summary
⁠46%1 analyzed article/video60 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Carmen Quito results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias and Unattributed Quote, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 50% saturation with 40 hits. Analysis detected 120 faulty-reasoning hits from 60 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 50% and a BS Rank of ⁠73% (12,467 of 44,758 speakers). This Carmen Quito is worse (more manipulative) than 72.10% of the peer group.
Carmen Quito
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%Paul Heideman1%
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Katy Longshore1%
⁠73%Carmen Quito (selected)50%
⁠100%291 Brewhouse100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 60
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

72% percentile
025507510072.1% percentile
50.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos60 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 19.2%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 1.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos