Speaker summary
67%3 analyzed articles/videos608.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Bianca Tylek results contain 18 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Confirmation Bias, and Negativity Bias, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 25.4% saturation with 173.564 hits. Analysis detected 1,109.751 faulty-reasoning hits from 608.333 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 8.2% and a BS Rank of 9% (41,161 of 45,145 speakers). This Bianca Tylek is better (less manipulative) than 91.20% of the peer group.
Bianca Tylek
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
0%Paul Heideman1%
0%The Brookings Institution1%
0%Conor Heffernan1%
0%Gen Jack Keane1%
0%Katy Longshore1%
9%Bianca Tylek (selected)9%
100%291 Brewhouse100%
100%21 Grams100%
100%2035 Initiative100%
100%1X representative100%
100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 608.333
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

9% percentile
02550751008.8% percentile
8.2% BS Score3 analyzed videos608.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 4.7%4.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 25.4%25.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 14.0%14.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 9.1%9.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 14.3%14.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 12.7%12.7%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 7.9%7.9%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Speaker 7.5%7.5%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Speaker 6.6%6.6%Horn EffectSitewide 1.0%Speaker 5.2%5.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 4.7%, sitewide 26.9%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 25.4%, sitewide 8.1%Negativity Bias: Speaker 12.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 9.1%, sitewide 15.9%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 14.3%, sitewide 7.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 14.0%, sitewide 3.3%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 6.9%, sitewide 11.1%Anecdotal: Speaker 9.3%, sitewide 5.2%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 9.2%, sitewide 9.1%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 7.9%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 7.5%, sitewide 2.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 6.6%, sitewide 2.0%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 1.1%, sitewide 5.3%Horn Effect: Speaker 5.2%, sitewide 1.0%False Dilemma: Speaker 4.0%, sitewide 1.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 3.5%, sitewide 1.9%Indoctrination: Speaker 3.1%, sitewide 0.0%Ad Hominem: Speaker 2.6%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate