Speaker summary
⁠59%1 analyzed article/video112 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Beth Senger results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Quote-first Misdirection, Unattributed Quote, and Optimism Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 33.6% saturation with 42.375 hits. Analysis detected 240.75 faulty-reasoning hits from 112 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 17.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠30% (31,911 of 45,145 speakers). This Beth Senger is better (less manipulative) than 70.70% of the peer group.
Beth Senger
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%Paul Heideman1%
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Katy Longshore1%
⁠30%Beth Senger (selected)18%
⁠100%291 Brewhouse100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 112
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

29% percentile
025507510029.3% percentile
17.5% BS Score1 analyzed videos112 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 20.8%20.8%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 20.8%20.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 21.7%21.7%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Speaker 13.1%13.1%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 11.3%11.3%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 11.3%11.3%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 33.6%33.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 13.1%13.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 11.3%11.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 33.6%, sitewide 26.9%Optimism Bias: Speaker 21.7%, sitewide 6.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 20.8%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 20.8%, sitewide 1.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Speaker 13.1%, sitewide 0.5%Halo Effect: Speaker 13.1%, sitewide 6.7%Begging the Question: Speaker 11.3%, sitewide 1.7%Indoctrination: Speaker 11.3%, sitewide 0.0%In-Group Bias: Speaker 11.3%, sitewide 6.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos