Speaker summary
⁠84%1 analyzed article/video46.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Belinda Escobosa results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including False Dilemma, Negativity Bias, and Quote-first Misdirection, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 75% saturation with 39.375 hits. Analysis detected 144.375 faulty-reasoning hits from 46.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 56.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠76% (10,980 of 45,145 speakers). This Belinda Escobosa is worse (more manipulative) than 75.70% of the peer group.
Belinda Escobosa
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%Paul Heideman1%
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Katy Longshore1%
⁠76%Belinda Escobosa (selected)57%
⁠100%291 Brewhouse100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 46.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

76% percentile
025507510075.7% percentile
56.3% BS Score1 analyzed videos46.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 75.0%75.0%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 50.0%50.0%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 75.0%, sitewide 15.9%False Dilemma: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 1.5%Negativity Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 19.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos