Speaker summary
58%2 analyzed articles/videos147 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Attorney General’s Office results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Framing Effect, and Negativity Bias, with Ambiguity (Equivocation) as the most egregious example at 38.1% saturation with 56 hits. Analysis detected 250 faulty-reasoning hits from 147 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 28.3% and a BS Rank of 48% (22,046 of 41,958 speakers). This Attorney General’s Office is better (less manipulative) than 52.50% of the peer group.
Attorney General’s Office
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
0%The Brookings Institution1%
0%Conor Heffernan1%
0%Gen Jack Keane1%
0%Katy Longshore1%
0%MARGARET BRENNAN1%
48%Attorney General’s Office (selected)29%
100%314 Action Fund100%
100%21 Grams100%
100%2035 Initiative100%
100%1X representative100%
100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 147
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

48% percentile
025507510047.5% percentile
28.3% BS Score2 analyzed videos147 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 38.1%38.1%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 31.3%31.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 31.3%31.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 31.3%31.3%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 31.3%31.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 6.8%6.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 38.1%, sitewide 0.8%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 31.3%, sitewide 15.9%Framing Effect: Speaker 31.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 31.3%, sitewide 19.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 31.3%, sitewide 0.0%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 6.8%, sitewide 4.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos