Speaker summary
58%2 analyzed articles/videos147 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Attorney General’s Office results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Framing Effect, and Negativity Bias, with Ambiguity (Equivocation) as the most egregious example at 38.1% saturation with 56 hits. Analysis detected 250 faulty-reasoning hits from 147 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 28.3% and a BS Rank of 48% (22,046 of 41,958 speakers). This Attorney General’s Office is better (less manipulative) than 52.50% of the peer group.
Attorney General’s Office
Speaker details
Ranking context
Position among analyzed speakers
28.3% BS Score2 analyzed videos147 analyzed words
Reasoning profile
Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
Sitewide departure map
Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often