Speaker summary
⁠42%1 analyzed article/video103.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Anne O’Connor results contain 1 faulty reasoning type, including Appeal to Authority, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 42% saturation with 58 hits. Analysis detected 58 faulty-reasoning hits from 103.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 42% and a BS Rank of ⁠63% (17,039 of 45,144 speakers). This Anne O’Connor is worse (more manipulative) than 62.30% of the peer group.
Anne O’Connor
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%Paul Heideman1%
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Katy Longshore1%
⁠63%Anne O’Connor (selected)43%
⁠100%291 Brewhouse100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 103.5
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

62% percentile
025507510062.3% percentile
42.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos103.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 42.0%42.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 42.0%, sitewide 11.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos