Author summary
21%1 analyzed article/video3,838 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sofia Resnick results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Availability Heuristic, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.8% saturation with 1,348 hits. Analysis detected 6,105 faulty-reasoning hits from 15,352 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1% and a BS Rank of 5% (8,314 of 8,706 authors). This Sofia Resnick is better (less manipulative) than 95.50% of the peer group.
Sofia Resnick
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
5%Sofia Resnick (selected)1%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 15,352
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

5% percentile
02550751004.5% percentile
1.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles15.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 0.8%0.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 1.1%1.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 8.8%8.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 3.6%3.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.1%0.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 1.1%1.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.4%0.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 3.2%3.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 0.4%0.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 2.8%2.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 0.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 8.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 3.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 2.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 2.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.6%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos