Speaker summary
⁠34%1 analyzed article/video184 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Andrew Bracker results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Optimism Bias, and Loss Aversion, with Sunk Cost Effect as the most egregious example at 12.7% saturation with 36 hits. Analysis detected 87.532 faulty-reasoning hits from 184 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 8.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠10% (40,869 of 45,145 speakers). This Andrew Bracker is better (less manipulative) than 90.50% of the peer group.
Andrew Bracker
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%Paul Heideman1%
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Katy Longshore1%
⁠10%Andrew Bracker (selected)9%
⁠100%291 Brewhouse100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 184
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

10% percentile
02550751009.5% percentile
8.5% BS Score1 analyzed videos184 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Sunk Cost EffectSitewide 0.3%Speaker 12.7%12.7%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Speaker 6.4%6.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 9.5%9.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 5.3%5.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Sunk Cost Effect: Speaker 12.7%, sitewide 0.3%Halo Effect: Speaker 9.5%, sitewide 6.7%Loss Aversion: Speaker 6.4%, sitewide 2.5%Optimism Bias: Speaker 5.3%, sitewide 6.0%Sunk Cost EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos