Author summary
5% 2 analyzed articles/videos 2,817 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kansas City Documenters results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Authority , and Halo Effect , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 4.6% saturation with 513 hits . Analysis detected 1,885 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,268 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 0.7% and a BS Rank of 2% (8,569 of 8,679 authors). This Kansas City Documenters is better (less manipulative) than 98.70% of the peer group. Kansas City Documenters
Author details
Total words: 11,268
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
1% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 1.3% percentile 0.7% BS Score2 analyzed articles11.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 0.6% 0.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 1.4% 1.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 0.6% 0.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.4% 1.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 0.5% 0.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 0.3% 0.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.5% 0.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.1% 0.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.4% 1.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 0.2% 0.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 0.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 0.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 0.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 4.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.3% Loss Aversion: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.1%, sitewide 0.8% Unattributed Quote: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.1% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 0.8%, sitewide 0.5% Burden of Proof: Author 0.2%, sitewide 0.4% Sunk Cost Effect: Author 0.3%, sitewide 0.3% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst