Speaker summary
52% 34 analyzed articles/videos 2,860 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Amy Coney Barrett results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal , Appeal to Authority , and Quote-first Misdirection , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 26.4% saturation with 900.286 hits . Analysis detected 4,532.762 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,860 analyzed words across 34 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 1% (44,870 of 45,124 speakers). This Amy Coney Barrett is better (less manipulative) than 99.40% of the peer group. Amy Coney Barrett
Speaker details
Total words: 2,860
Article count: 34
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
1% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.6% percentile 2.6% BS Score34 analyzed videos2.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 1.3% 1.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 4.0% 4.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 26.4% 26.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Speaker 13.2% 13.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 0.6% 0.6% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 6.8% 6.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Speaker 1.6% 1.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Speaker 0.9% 0.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Speaker 0.4% 0.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Speaker 1.6% 1.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 1.3%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 26.4%, sitewide 15.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 4.0%, sitewide 19.2% Anecdotal: Speaker 13.2%, sitewide 5.2% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 6.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 4.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 0.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 1.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Speaker 0.9%, sitewide 6.9% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 6.8%, sitewide 0.0% Halo Effect: Speaker 1.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Speaker 0.4%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 5.1%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 2.4%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 2.1%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 1.0%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 0.6%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 2.7%, sitewide 1.1% Recency Bias: Speaker 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 2.6%, sitewide 0.8% Bandwagon: Speaker 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Speaker 1.3%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Speaker 1.6%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst