Publication summary
71% 4 analyzed articles/videos 741 analyzed words
BS Summary: These The Times of India results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Anecdotal , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 11% saturation with 520 hits . Analysis detected 3,159 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,738 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 72% (166 of 584 publications). This The Times of India is worse (more manipulative) than 71.70% of the peer group. Publication details
Total words: 4,738
Article count: 4
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
72% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 71.7% percentile 2.2% BS Score4 analyzed articles4.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 4.4% 4.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 6.4% 6.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 3.8% 3.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 3.2% 3.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Publication 0.3% 0.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 11.0% 11.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Publication 2.8% 2.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Publication 4.0% 4.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Publication 3.2% 3.2% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Publication 1.3% 1.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 4.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 6.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 11.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Publication 3.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Publication 3.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Publication 4.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 2.8%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Publication 3.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 2.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Publication 4.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 1.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Publication 2.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 1.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 1.1%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% Quote-first Misdirection: Publication 2.3%, sitewide 0.0% Ad Hominem: Publication 1.5%, sitewide 2.2% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Publication 2.1%, sitewide 0.5% Unattributed Quote: Publication 2.0%, sitewide 1.1% Representativeness Heuristic: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst