Speaker summary
⁠62%1 analyzed article/video97.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Amy Bruckman results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Middle Ground and Optimism Bias, with False Dilemma as the most egregious example at 55.1% saturation with 60.375 hits. Analysis detected 118.375 faulty-reasoning hits from 97.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 31.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠52% (19,016 of 39,201 speakers). This Amy Bruckman is worse (more manipulative) than 51.50% of the peer group.
Amy Bruckman
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%MARGARET BRENNAN1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠52%Amy Bruckman (selected)32%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 97.333
Article count: 1
Authors
?

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

52% percentile
025507510051.5% percentile
31.6% BS Score1 analyzed videos97.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 55.1%55.1%Middle GroundSitewide 0.1%Speaker 19.9%19.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 19.9%19.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%False Dilemma: Speaker 55.1%, sitewide 1.5%Middle Ground: Speaker 19.9%, sitewide 0.1%Optimism Bias: Speaker 19.9%, sitewide 6.0%False DilemmaSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos