Speaker summary
⁠44%1 analyzed article/video405 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Alice McShane results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Pessimism Bias, and Halo Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.5% saturation with 50 hits. Analysis detected 168.008 faulty-reasoning hits from 405 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 7% and a BS Rank of ⁠7% (42,401 of 45,369 speakers). This Alice McShane is better (less manipulative) than 93.50% of the peer group.
Alice McShane
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%Paul Heideman1%
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Katy Longshore1%
⁠7%Alice McShane (selected)7%
⁠100%291 Brewhouse100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 405
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

7% percentile
02550751006.5% percentile
7.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos405 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 12.5%12.5%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 7.8%7.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 3.8%3.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 8.6%8.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 5.8%5.8%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Speaker 3.5%3.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Negativity Bias: Speaker 12.5%, sitewide 19.2%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 8.6%, sitewide 7.5%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 3.8%, sitewide 8.1%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 7.8%, sitewide 1.9%Halo Effect: Speaker 5.8%, sitewide 6.7%Recency Bias: Speaker 3.5%, sitewide 2.7%Negativity BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos