Speaker summary
43%6 analyzed articles/videos73.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These ABC7 results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Fundamental Attribution Error, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 21.1% saturation with 40 hits. Analysis detected 178 faulty-reasoning hits from 73.667 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 15.6% and a BS Rank of 26% (33,636 of 45,122 speakers). This ABC7 is better (less manipulative) than 74.50% of the peer group.
ABC7
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
0%Paul Heideman1%
0%The Brookings Institution1%
0%Conor Heffernan1%
0%Gen Jack Keane1%
0%Katy Longshore1%
26%ABC7 (selected)16%
100%291 Brewhouse100%
100%21 Grams100%
100%2035 Initiative100%
100%1X representative100%
100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

26% percentile
025507510025.5% percentile
15.6% BS Score6 analyzed videos73.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 20.0%20.0%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Speaker 18.9%18.9%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 17.9%17.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 7.9%7.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 21.1%21.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 7.9%7.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 17.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 21.1%, sitewide 19.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 20.0%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 18.9%, sitewide 2.7%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 7.9%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 7.9%, sitewide 7.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate